Where is the Learner?
According
to a report on Learning and Development, most of the organisations are now
revising their learning strategy to focus more on the learner and his learning
needs in order to form a stronger link between a learner’s learning and the
organisation’s performance. The organisations are eventually exploring
different learning modalities and use of different technologies to make the
learning more effective for learner.
Considering this to be a positive step towards recognising the learner
and his learning needs in sync with his and the organisation’s performance, we
can hope that this practice gains momentum and the present facts that I am
going to share with you become glimpses from the past of learning and development
functions and practices:
The primary objective of learning and development is to help
the learner to develop the required behavioural traits and skill set needed to
effectively achieve his functional/performance objectives. (Refer to the post: WHY ASK?) Therefore, the learning
and development process begins with the learner’s Training Need Analysis or
Skills Gap Analysis, which requires profiling of the learners’ educational, demographic,
functional background along with the learners’ working environment. The Need Analysis also comprises of:
Learner Analysis in terms of: Entry Behaviors, Attitudes
toward content, Academic motivation, General learning preferences
and the characteristics of the learners’ group. The next step of Context
Analysis to study the context in which the skills learnt will be applied in
real life. The analysis comprises of physical and technical study to analyse
the desired level of performance, socio-cultural background and the
geographical location of the learners, resources and constraints of the
existing learning support.
Learner
and Context Analysis is incomplete without the Content Analysis which requires
the study of the efficacy of any existing learning intervention, learning
content along with existing information resource or Knowledge pool available to
help the learners develop necessary behavioural traits and skills needed for
performance improvement. The objective of the study is to define the learner’s
learning objectives and design effective learning strategy to help the learner
achieve their learning objectives.
All
these steps require the involvement of the management in the form of the
functional heads, managers, supervisors, subject matter experts, trainers or
training providers, learning strategy designers and learning content
developers, but the most important person in this whole process is the learner
who should be involved from the beginning to the end of the process. (Refer to
the post: Agile Learning Design for Workplace Learning).
It
is not so in reality. The entire learning process beginning from the Need
Analysis to the design and development of the learning intervention is
meticulously done by all the stakeholders in complete absence of the learner.
The Management, the SMEs and the Content development professionals focus on the
requirement of the organisation and develop the learning solution. Often, the
Learning Strategists and Content Developers develop the entire solution based
on inputs from SMEs with prime focus on the Trainers for ILT solutions and the
management and their budgetary sanction to design technology based learning
solution with practically no interaction with the real customer or the real
user of the solution: The Learner.
This
results in the learning and development to be a mere formality that most of the
learners consider to be a paid holiday and they give a rather deceptive
feedback on their learning experience and its benefits. The feedback cannot be
validated in the absence of effective evaluation process to assess the
performance of the learners post the learning intervention.
Therefore,
it is time for most of the organisations to not treat the learning and
development function as a regulatory compliance that will earn them the status of a
progressive organisation that gives due importance to the development of its
human resource. Therefore it was heartening to read that the organisations are
now trying to realign their learning and development functions and make it
learner centric and not management, SME, Trainer or Technology centric.
This
also holds good for the academic learners studying in various educational
institutions. The curriculum and the design of the learning strategies do not
focus on the target learner group and its learning objectives, but on the
educational institutions and their teaching staff, which results in the
learners dropping out of the learning process. Another living proof is the
mushrooming of the Coaching Institutes across the country and most of the
learners making a beeline to them with the aspiration of improving their
academic scores and performance.
Comments
Post a Comment